Alex, Matt believes the Bible is the inerrant Word of God. As such he (as do I ) believes Marriage was instituted by God as between 1 man & 1 woman as both a model of the relationship amongst the Trinity and as the vehicle for procreation. Any other arrangements for marriage are not biblical marriages. You are welcome to have any other arrangement, just don’t call them marriage. There was a time when homosexual activists said, give us domestic partnerships and we will be happy, but of course, they were lying. It was just the first step.
It is not a matter of hate, but being faithful.
Take him up on it, break bread with him and discuss his feelings and views.
Children need a father and a mother, biological male & female. Of course, we are all fallen & will be less than perfect parents and models, but homosexuals are no less or more scarred by sin.
I'm not sure you quite understand Matt Walsh. I think he would stand against gay marriage even if it will be called other name. I personally don't care how it's called as long as all legal rights are observed. I don't care of marrying in the church either. But I'm not sure for Matt Walsh the only problem is in the name.
Also, why should marriage be biblical for everyone? What's about atheists and non Christians, why should they adhere to Biblical definitions? And Matt Walsh wants everyone to adhere to them - e.g., to impose his views down on everyone.
No one forces Matt Walsh to enter a gay marriage or have gay sex. But he wants to ban other people from both, and that's the problem.
Alex, you REALLY don’t understand. Whether you like it or not God is the ultimate reality. For now he lets us play our games and invent ‘rules’ that we can play by for the time being, but in the end He wins, not you nor Matt nor I. God made the rules and the game; the Reality. At the end of Time, we will all crash into that immovable wall and either be wrecked by it FOREVER because we insist on our own way, or we confess that we are/were wrong and beg for forgiveness and get to enjoy REAL LIFE, REAL REALITY for ever with Him. Those are the only options. Matt is just stating the truth and consequences.
God isn't an ultimate reality, I'm sorry, his existence is unproven, there's no single proof of it, and to present your subjective unproven beliefs as an 'ultimate reality' is actually dangerous and totalitarian.
Second, the Scriptures aren't actually straightforward on gay stuff (pun intended). Sodom and Gomorrah story is a warning against raping an angel (and angels are sexless spiritual beings) and allegorically - desecration of the sacred (which is angel), it was misinterpreted by homophobes. Jesus said nothing against gays. Apostle Paul did but he was just a homophobic Pharisee who twisted Jesus teaching for Romans. And don't tell me of Leviticus which apart from condemning gats praises war, slavery and even genocides, all of which are hideous crimes against humanity.
So sorry but Matt Walsh doesn't say ANY single word of truth. Even of you're Christian, his fundamentalist version of Christianity is twisting of Scriptures and lies. And if you're an atheist, Buddhist, Hindu, Taoist, etc., you're even less so have to live in Matt Walsh psychotic version of Christianity, and Matt Walsh has NO MORAL RIGHT to enforce his views down on everyone.
Matt Walsh is a dangerous psychopath, tyrant, liar, hypocrite, sexist and homophobe. He's a fake Christian too who misinterprets Scriptures to justify his sick evil homophobia. This man is my mortal enemy and I'd do everything in my power to bring him down. He's even more dangerous than Woke psychopaths.
You're a fanatic if you think so and a dangerous one as such. If you can't assess the dogmas of your religion critically, you're the problem.
P. S. Pharisee Paul heresy isn't part of the Gospel, same as Leviticus, and Jesus said nothing against gays.
In the contrary, Paul and Leviticus directly contradict Jesus words and if not for your fanatical blind trust to them and absence of critical approach, you would have seen it yourself.
Homophobes judge people for love this violating TWO Jesus major maxims at the same time - 'Don't judge and don't be judged' and 'Love your neighbor'. Homophobes are fake Christians and are essentially evil, sinful, sick, psychotic people.
I don’t know anyone who is afraid of homosexuals, I certainly am not. Homophobe is a made up slur that doesn’t describe me in its literal meaning.
I will accept that I am sinful, as are we all. I reject your other charges.
I am not interested in playing gotcha verse by verse with someone who doesn’t really believe a thing in the Bible.
The Bible was not written to be critiqued by men, but to critique men. Until you understand that, you are not being serious; you are speeding straight for your crash with the solid wall of reality and it will not go well with you.
I’m not a fan. I used to be. But it’s not because he clearly thinks homosexuality is a sin and a great evil. I’m gay but can’t say that it isn’t those things. I’m not self-hating as much as self-transcending. I know what gay culture is all about. I couldn’t care less if he hates the gays. I just think he’s a psychopath irrespective of his views. He and Douglas Murray have that psychotic twinkle in their eyes.
Well, as a gay man I obviously care about his hate for gay men - this hate at our time when gays came out of the closet and people saw that they're harmless, this hate is inexcusable.
But you're right, there's much more to it than just that. And he is a psychopath. You're very observant if you could spot it just from a twinkle in the eyes, gives you an honor!
Thanks for writing about this. I feel like lots of people on the left think Matt Walsh is emblematic of people on the right. He does so much damage to the populist right movement.
Yeah, exactly, he makes Woke ‘Christofascism’ boogieman come true. He's as damaging to the right as AOC is to the Left.
And yet almost no one on the right is willing to call him out either because they secretly agree with him or because they're afraid of ‘eating their own' which is as stupid and ridiculous as when the Left refuse to call their countless loons out. We're lucky we have not so many loons like Matt Walsh but still.
I have to agree with you. I started liking what Walsh had to say, and then he became everything that is wrong with the alt right. I think Peterson nailed it with, and I am paraphrasing, the right is too far right when they want to deny equal access to opportunity and the left is too far left when they demand equal outcome. Neither end of these spectrums is moral, ethical or logically justifiable.
Actually a very good distinction by Jordan Peterson, thanks for that!
And yeah I also wanted to like him but I just can when he acts exactly as a Woke boogieman of 'Christofascist' rooting for restoration of an Inquisition.
+++ Hypocritical Left and Greens Vote Against Transparency on Pfizergate +++
Today, the European Parliament rejected an amendment tabled by ESN Group that simply reaffirmed its commitment to full transparency following the EU General Court’s recent ruling on Pfizergate.
The Court ruled on 14 May 2025 that the European Commission was wrong to withhold text messages between its President and the CEO of Pfizer—messages exchanged during vaccine procurement talks. The judgment confirmed that such messages fall under EU transparency rules and must be made public.
In response, we proposed that Parliament “reiterates its full commitment to complete transparency on this matter.”
Yet, astonishingly, a majority—including nearly all Members of the Social Democrats (S&D), the Greens, and the Left, notably Daniel Freund and Martin Schirdewan—voted against this basic statement of principle.
💬 Christine Anderson, author of the amendment and Chief Whip of the ESN Group, stated:
“Our amendment was neither controversial nor partisan. Yet, the left and green side of the House votes against it. This is a stunning display of hypocrisy. These very same MEPs publicly applauded the Court’s ruling but refused to support a basic commitment to openness when it counted.
Transparency must not be a slogan—it must be a principle. We will not let this matter be swept under the rug, nor will we allow Ursula von der Leyen to escape accountability.”
Monstrous, but not surprised. Merkel recently stood against European countries fighting illegal immigration because it will 'destroy European unity'. They're openly saying they don't care neither of people nor of democracy and transparency, EU is absolutely evil.
Eh, I like him in moderation. But I certainly don’t always agree with everything he says and also his fast paced talking is hard to listen to at 1.5 speed sometimes. He is a great debater though!
I do like and see Micheal Knowles on Megyn Kelly often, he’s probably my favorite at DW and occasionally Andrew Klaven, who I don’t mind most times.
But see that’s where things get muddled, Matt Walsh being the way he is with “condemning gay marriage & female employment” doesn’t necessarily make him a hypocrite-it’s quite the opposite actually, because he is considered a Christian he should be opposed to same sex marriage (according to all Bibles within the past 30+ years) & female employment? He may have that old fashioned belief that the man works and takes care of bills and the woman takes care of house and kids-and there is nothing wrong with this if it’s what you like. Other employment issues for woman as far as “equality in pay and treatment” will never happen for every woman. The ones that do not have kids or want to have babies and choose to make work their priority definitely should have equality. The other women that have careers but have to take maternity leave or sick days for kids will never have that equality at most places. They can’t be relied upon to drop everything they’re doing if the boss needs you last minute for something at work whereas that man that has that stay at home wife can.
As far as I believe? I could care less who anyone marries I’m not against gay marriage and I’m not out protesting either. Women in work place? Depends on case by case for me. If sometimes having to do things that weren’t in your hiring papers (like coming to work at last minute) is held against you when discussing promotions or pay raises—it shouldn’t be.
First of all, both The Bible homophobia and sexism aren't as straightforward as the Church would make you believe. For example, Sodom and Gomorrah story is a warning against the rape of an angel, who is a sexless spiritual being, not against consensual gay sex, and to believe angels are male just because of their male name is erroneous, and anyway it was about rape, not consensual sex. Jesus said nothing against gays, and Leviticus which condemned gay men to death also praised slavery, wars and genocides all of which is rejected by Christianity. In no verse does the Scriptures say that men should 'provide' and women sit home either. Matt Walsh is a liar.
But you're right though, his sexism abd homophobia alone don't make him a hypocrite. What makes him a hypocrite is that he claims also to support FREEDOM and condemns Woke Censorship and tyranny yet he himself wants to ban gay marriage and female employment, that is, to take gay and female basic freedoms and rights away from us. That's a pure hypocrisy and tyranny.
And sorry Matt Walsh has NO any moral right to decide fate of millions of women and gay men and to push his sick fanatical beliefs which even many Christians don't share and even more so atheists, down on everyone. That's pure totalitarian tyranny anx exactly Christofascism which the Woke were telling about, and ironically they turned out right with Matt Walsh at least. He's 100% Christofascist, and a psychopath as such.
“The fetal heartbeat can typically be detected using ultrasound as early as 5-6 weeks of pregnancy, with a fetal pole (first visible sign) often seen around that time. Some sources mention the heart starting to beat around 22 days after conception.” Jeremiah 1:5 states that God knew us before we were formed in the womb, and Psalm 139:13-16 details how God knows us even before birth. These passages suggest that God has a plan for each individual's life and is intimately aware of their existence and purpose even before they are born. We were made in the image of God. He robed Himself in flesh as Jesus, the Son of God. All life is sacred, which biologically begins at conception.
Still, it's a lesser evil than to force rape victims to have babies from their rapists, don't you think so? And in forth month of pregnancy there's no fetus, so no one to feel pain or have conscience.
A fetus is the stage of prenatal development that begins approximately 8 weeks after fertilization and lasts until birth. During this period, the developing baby is no longer called an embryo. Life begins biologically at conception. My wife couldn’t wait to tell others we were pregnant shortly after discovery (long time ago). Rape pregnancies are extremely rare and incredibly difficult for expecting mothers, but only she can make that decision.
No, life begins at conception. Life is precious and it’s our responsibility to protect, treasure and celebrate it from conception. We have three children who blessed us with five grandchildren. I do not have the capacity to comprehend a decision that would have prevented their arrival. Everyone’s life, young and old, is invaluable in God’s eyes — and so it should be for us.
Homophobia was initially defined as an irrational fear of homosexuality based on seeing your own homosexual tendencies in others and not being able to deal with it. The word has morphed into meaning hatred of homosexuals.
Alex, Matt believes the Bible is the inerrant Word of God. As such he (as do I ) believes Marriage was instituted by God as between 1 man & 1 woman as both a model of the relationship amongst the Trinity and as the vehicle for procreation. Any other arrangements for marriage are not biblical marriages. You are welcome to have any other arrangement, just don’t call them marriage. There was a time when homosexual activists said, give us domestic partnerships and we will be happy, but of course, they were lying. It was just the first step.
It is not a matter of hate, but being faithful.
Take him up on it, break bread with him and discuss his feelings and views.
Children need a father and a mother, biological male & female. Of course, we are all fallen & will be less than perfect parents and models, but homosexuals are no less or more scarred by sin.
I'm not sure you quite understand Matt Walsh. I think he would stand against gay marriage even if it will be called other name. I personally don't care how it's called as long as all legal rights are observed. I don't care of marrying in the church either. But I'm not sure for Matt Walsh the only problem is in the name.
Also, why should marriage be biblical for everyone? What's about atheists and non Christians, why should they adhere to Biblical definitions? And Matt Walsh wants everyone to adhere to them - e.g., to impose his views down on everyone.
No one forces Matt Walsh to enter a gay marriage or have gay sex. But he wants to ban other people from both, and that's the problem.
Alex, you REALLY don’t understand. Whether you like it or not God is the ultimate reality. For now he lets us play our games and invent ‘rules’ that we can play by for the time being, but in the end He wins, not you nor Matt nor I. God made the rules and the game; the Reality. At the end of Time, we will all crash into that immovable wall and either be wrecked by it FOREVER because we insist on our own way, or we confess that we are/were wrong and beg for forgiveness and get to enjoy REAL LIFE, REAL REALITY for ever with Him. Those are the only options. Matt is just stating the truth and consequences.
God isn't an ultimate reality, I'm sorry, his existence is unproven, there's no single proof of it, and to present your subjective unproven beliefs as an 'ultimate reality' is actually dangerous and totalitarian.
Second, the Scriptures aren't actually straightforward on gay stuff (pun intended). Sodom and Gomorrah story is a warning against raping an angel (and angels are sexless spiritual beings) and allegorically - desecration of the sacred (which is angel), it was misinterpreted by homophobes. Jesus said nothing against gays. Apostle Paul did but he was just a homophobic Pharisee who twisted Jesus teaching for Romans. And don't tell me of Leviticus which apart from condemning gats praises war, slavery and even genocides, all of which are hideous crimes against humanity.
So sorry but Matt Walsh doesn't say ANY single word of truth. Even of you're Christian, his fundamentalist version of Christianity is twisting of Scriptures and lies. And if you're an atheist, Buddhist, Hindu, Taoist, etc., you're even less so have to live in Matt Walsh psychotic version of Christianity, and Matt Walsh has NO MORAL RIGHT to enforce his views down on everyone.
Matt Walsh is a dangerous psychopath, tyrant, liar, hypocrite, sexist and homophobe. He's a fake Christian too who misinterprets Scriptures to justify his sick evil homophobia. This man is my mortal enemy and I'd do everything in my power to bring him down. He's even more dangerous than Woke psychopaths.
Alex, Alex, Alex,
One of us is right and one of us is wrong.
I like you, but you are not the one.
The Empty Tomb says you are wrong, along with everyone else who denies the Gospel. I rest on that.
Read ‘Evidence that Demands a Verdict’.
You're a fanatic if you think so and a dangerous one as such. If you can't assess the dogmas of your religion critically, you're the problem.
P. S. Pharisee Paul heresy isn't part of the Gospel, same as Leviticus, and Jesus said nothing against gays.
In the contrary, Paul and Leviticus directly contradict Jesus words and if not for your fanatical blind trust to them and absence of critical approach, you would have seen it yourself.
Homophobes judge people for love this violating TWO Jesus major maxims at the same time - 'Don't judge and don't be judged' and 'Love your neighbor'. Homophobes are fake Christians and are essentially evil, sinful, sick, psychotic people.
I don’t know anyone who is afraid of homosexuals, I certainly am not. Homophobe is a made up slur that doesn’t describe me in its literal meaning.
I will accept that I am sinful, as are we all. I reject your other charges.
I am not interested in playing gotcha verse by verse with someone who doesn’t really believe a thing in the Bible.
The Bible was not written to be critiqued by men, but to critique men. Until you understand that, you are not being serious; you are speeding straight for your crash with the solid wall of reality and it will not go well with you.
I’m not a fan. I used to be. But it’s not because he clearly thinks homosexuality is a sin and a great evil. I’m gay but can’t say that it isn’t those things. I’m not self-hating as much as self-transcending. I know what gay culture is all about. I couldn’t care less if he hates the gays. I just think he’s a psychopath irrespective of his views. He and Douglas Murray have that psychotic twinkle in their eyes.
Well, as a gay man I obviously care about his hate for gay men - this hate at our time when gays came out of the closet and people saw that they're harmless, this hate is inexcusable.
But you're right, there's much more to it than just that. And he is a psychopath. You're very observant if you could spot it just from a twinkle in the eyes, gives you an honor!
Don’t waste your energy caring what he thinks and spend more time at a shooting range instead 😂 you know, just in case
Lol, good point, thank you!
Yep, just keep that stereotype going.
Which one
That the queers are the ones doing all the shooting.
LOL. I might have to follow you for that
Thanks for writing about this. I feel like lots of people on the left think Matt Walsh is emblematic of people on the right. He does so much damage to the populist right movement.
Yeah, exactly, he makes Woke ‘Christofascism’ boogieman come true. He's as damaging to the right as AOC is to the Left.
And yet almost no one on the right is willing to call him out either because they secretly agree with him or because they're afraid of ‘eating their own' which is as stupid and ridiculous as when the Left refuse to call their countless loons out. We're lucky we have not so many loons like Matt Walsh but still.
I have to agree with you. I started liking what Walsh had to say, and then he became everything that is wrong with the alt right. I think Peterson nailed it with, and I am paraphrasing, the right is too far right when they want to deny equal access to opportunity and the left is too far left when they demand equal outcome. Neither end of these spectrums is moral, ethical or logically justifiable.
Actually a very good distinction by Jordan Peterson, thanks for that!
And yeah I also wanted to like him but I just can when he acts exactly as a Woke boogieman of 'Christofascist' rooting for restoration of an Inquisition.
🇨🇦🇺🇸🇬🇧🇦🇺
+++ Hypocritical Left and Greens Vote Against Transparency on Pfizergate +++
Today, the European Parliament rejected an amendment tabled by ESN Group that simply reaffirmed its commitment to full transparency following the EU General Court’s recent ruling on Pfizergate.
The Court ruled on 14 May 2025 that the European Commission was wrong to withhold text messages between its President and the CEO of Pfizer—messages exchanged during vaccine procurement talks. The judgment confirmed that such messages fall under EU transparency rules and must be made public.
In response, we proposed that Parliament “reiterates its full commitment to complete transparency on this matter.”
Yet, astonishingly, a majority—including nearly all Members of the Social Democrats (S&D), the Greens, and the Left, notably Daniel Freund and Martin Schirdewan—voted against this basic statement of principle.
💬 Christine Anderson, author of the amendment and Chief Whip of the ESN Group, stated:
“Our amendment was neither controversial nor partisan. Yet, the left and green side of the House votes against it. This is a stunning display of hypocrisy. These very same MEPs publicly applauded the Court’s ruling but refused to support a basic commitment to openness when it counted.
Transparency must not be a slogan—it must be a principle. We will not let this matter be swept under the rug, nor will we allow Ursula von der Leyen to escape accountability.”
➡️ Follow me on Telegram: @christineanderson
_
https://t.me/christineanderson/1169
Monstrous, but not surprised. Merkel recently stood against European countries fighting illegal immigration because it will 'destroy European unity'. They're openly saying they don't care neither of people nor of democracy and transparency, EU is absolutely evil.
Epstein didn’t kill himself high signature of the 133.
https://thephoenixenigma.com/the-high-signature-133/
I like Matt and Ben less and less. I’m done with Daily Wire. Candice and Brett are gone now and I can watch Jordan elsewhere if I wish.
What's about Ben Shapiro, what shit was he saying?
Eh, I like him in moderation. But I certainly don’t always agree with everything he says and also his fast paced talking is hard to listen to at 1.5 speed sometimes. He is a great debater though!
I do like and see Micheal Knowles on Megyn Kelly often, he’s probably my favorite at DW and occasionally Andrew Klaven, who I don’t mind most times.
Wasn't Michael Knowles homophobic too though, or not as much as Matt Walsh?
Yes, but doesn’t dwell on it as harshly.
Still not good but maybe not as bad as in Matt Walsh's case.
Learn about predictive programming with my Essay here:
https://open.substack.com/pub/soberchristiangentlemanpodcast/p/essay-the-dangers-of-predictive-programming?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=31s3eo
That's a complex and tricky issue, and subjective one as such. My point is that people don't have a right to enforce their beliefs upon others.
Agreed.
This is what I’ve been saying!!!
Good we aren't alone with it!
But see that’s where things get muddled, Matt Walsh being the way he is with “condemning gay marriage & female employment” doesn’t necessarily make him a hypocrite-it’s quite the opposite actually, because he is considered a Christian he should be opposed to same sex marriage (according to all Bibles within the past 30+ years) & female employment? He may have that old fashioned belief that the man works and takes care of bills and the woman takes care of house and kids-and there is nothing wrong with this if it’s what you like. Other employment issues for woman as far as “equality in pay and treatment” will never happen for every woman. The ones that do not have kids or want to have babies and choose to make work their priority definitely should have equality. The other women that have careers but have to take maternity leave or sick days for kids will never have that equality at most places. They can’t be relied upon to drop everything they’re doing if the boss needs you last minute for something at work whereas that man that has that stay at home wife can.
As far as I believe? I could care less who anyone marries I’m not against gay marriage and I’m not out protesting either. Women in work place? Depends on case by case for me. If sometimes having to do things that weren’t in your hiring papers (like coming to work at last minute) is held against you when discussing promotions or pay raises—it shouldn’t be.
Really the list could go on and on and on.
First of all, both The Bible homophobia and sexism aren't as straightforward as the Church would make you believe. For example, Sodom and Gomorrah story is a warning against the rape of an angel, who is a sexless spiritual being, not against consensual gay sex, and to believe angels are male just because of their male name is erroneous, and anyway it was about rape, not consensual sex. Jesus said nothing against gays, and Leviticus which condemned gay men to death also praised slavery, wars and genocides all of which is rejected by Christianity. In no verse does the Scriptures say that men should 'provide' and women sit home either. Matt Walsh is a liar.
But you're right though, his sexism abd homophobia alone don't make him a hypocrite. What makes him a hypocrite is that he claims also to support FREEDOM and condemns Woke Censorship and tyranny yet he himself wants to ban gay marriage and female employment, that is, to take gay and female basic freedoms and rights away from us. That's a pure hypocrisy and tyranny.
And sorry Matt Walsh has NO any moral right to decide fate of millions of women and gay men and to push his sick fanatical beliefs which even many Christians don't share and even more so atheists, down on everyone. That's pure totalitarian tyranny anx exactly Christofascism which the Woke were telling about, and ironically they turned out right with Matt Walsh at least. He's 100% Christofascist, and a psychopath as such.
You’re a moron
Strike a nerve? Truth hurts? One more insult and you're blocked though.
Psychopathic tyrants like Matt Walsh have no place in our society.
What an enlightened and useful comment. You must be such a hot commodity with the local debate team.
“The fetal heartbeat can typically be detected using ultrasound as early as 5-6 weeks of pregnancy, with a fetal pole (first visible sign) often seen around that time. Some sources mention the heart starting to beat around 22 days after conception.” Jeremiah 1:5 states that God knew us before we were formed in the womb, and Psalm 139:13-16 details how God knows us even before birth. These passages suggest that God has a plan for each individual's life and is intimately aware of their existence and purpose even before they are born. We were made in the image of God. He robed Himself in flesh as Jesus, the Son of God. All life is sacred, which biologically begins at conception.
You're talking of abortions now, it's different topic, I said nothing of it. My point is Jesus said nothing against gay people and homosexuality.
In reference to your Matt Walsh commentary.
Still, it's a lesser evil than to force rape victims to have babies from their rapists, don't you think so? And in forth month of pregnancy there's no fetus, so no one to feel pain or have conscience.
A fetus is the stage of prenatal development that begins approximately 8 weeks after fertilization and lasts until birth. During this period, the developing baby is no longer called an embryo. Life begins biologically at conception. My wife couldn’t wait to tell others we were pregnant shortly after discovery (long time ago). Rape pregnancies are extremely rare and incredibly difficult for expecting mothers, but only she can make that decision.
So abortions on first 8 weeks of pregnancy are alright for you too?
And rape pregnancies are more frequent than you think, it's just hard for many women to talk of it.
No, life begins at conception. Life is precious and it’s our responsibility to protect, treasure and celebrate it from conception. We have three children who blessed us with five grandchildren. I do not have the capacity to comprehend a decision that would have prevented their arrival. Everyone’s life, young and old, is invaluable in God’s eyes — and so it should be for us.
Good 👍 for you for burning 🥵 him alive ?
Homophobia was initially defined as an irrational fear of homosexuality based on seeing your own homosexual tendencies in others and not being able to deal with it. The word has morphed into meaning hatred of homosexuals.
Well, that's true and maybe not the best term but also it still implies irrational hate though.