Who is Worse - Stephen King or Neil Gaiman?

They are the Worst Woke Regime Celebrity Sycophants

Both are abominable sycophants of the Woke regime of our Billionaire Empire (as I call new Western globalist regime ruled by billionaire elite who had infiltrated all our governments and had bought all our media and institutions). Both readily jump on any trendy political bandwagon for the sake of virtue-signaling. Both readily sign up for any trendy political shit however controversial.

For example, of a recent both of them decided to ban their books from being sold in Russia hence banning millions of innocent Russian people from reading their books (and Putin doesn't read books, not speculative fiction at least). So, who of those Regime bootlickers is worse?

On the one hand, Stephen King is more vocal Regime supporter who opens his mouth (or Twitter) to spout Woke bigotry more often than Neil Gaiman who prefers to be not that loud. On the other hand, Stephen King's Woke political activism didn't affect his fiction this far (unlike with Neil Gaiman). And I have a strong opinion there (which I also expressed while defending JK Rowling against unprecedented trans abuse) - an author has a right to have ANY political views (however abominable) as long as it doesn't affect his fiction. So Stephen King might turn into the Wokest celebrity ever for all I care. But if King starts to propagate mandatory vaccination and trans surgeries for kids in his FICTION, then I'd have a very serious problem with him (and everyone else should too). This far, he doesn't though, or at least I'm not aware of it if he does.

Neil Gaiman, in the contrary, let Woke political agenda affect and mutilate his fiction (infamous The Sandman adaptation example). This is already much more serious problem. In doing so, Neil Gaiman also essentially lies to his fans (first telling them his Death is pale-skinned gothic girl, then - that she's a Black woman) and betrays his fandom. Neil Gaiman also bullies his fans - if they won't accept his Woke lies, then they're 'racists'. That's incredible shameless arrogance towards his fans. I think after that literally EVERY Neil Gaiman fan should abandon him. Stephen King in my memory didn't lie to his fans, didn't bully them and didn't betray them. That makes King, even if Woke sycophant he is, still BY FAR better than shameless, spineless and arrogant liar, bully and traitor Neil Gaiman.

Speaking of their fiction. As a writer myself, I consider King's fiction to be pretty mediocre, and I never liked him much as an author, long before he turned Woke. Still, it might be pretty subjective view, and millions of people seem to like his writing. And anyway, even if his fiction is mediocre, it is at least ORIGINAL. Stephen King isn't a plagiarist. Neil Gaiman, in the contrary, steals ideas for his novels from other authors without acknowledging it (I had shown before how and from whom) which makes his ideas stolen ones, and Neil Gaiman himself - just a dirty shameless plagiarist. Again, by far, Neil Gaiman's crime is FAR worse - better mediocrity than plagiarism.

To conclude my analysis, Neil Gaiman is worse by far than Stephen King. He might have abominable political views (or pretend to adopt them in order to stay popular in uncertain Woke times when any dissenting celebrity might be canceled like JK Rowling's example had shown) but he's at least honest with his fans and in his fiction. Neil Gaiman, in the contrary, lies to his fans, betrays his legacy and plagiarizes his ideas. All of it are pretty serious misdeeds IMO, and for plagiarism Neil Gaiman could (and in my view SHOULD!) be even sued. In short, fuck Neil Gaiman, he's the most abominable celebrity there is (oh wait, maybe abusive manipulative slanderous bitch Amber Heard is worse, but this post isn't about her).