Asexuals are Just Voluntary Celibates

Yet Another Woke 'Sexual Identity' is a Fraudulent One

There’s another Woke sexual identity in the Alphabet soup which we do not hear as often about - asexuals. By definition, it’s people who don’t have sex and don’t even feel any sexual attraction. And with the last part I do really struggle.

The Woke don’t mean people with erectile disfunction by that mind you - nope, they mean physically healthy people who just don’t or can’t feel any sexual attraction. But how the hell is that even possible, especially for men with their biology?

Again, I understand that some people might have low sexual drive, but they STILL have it though. I understand some people, especially women, might not be able to feel sexual attraction without romantic and emotional connection. I also understand that some other people, primarily rape victims, and mostly female ones, might suppress their sexual attraction because it’s painful and traumatic for them to even think of sex after their huge trauma.

I understand all of that, but to have NO sexual attraction at all - how come? I don’t think it’s even possible, really. It’s possible to suppress one’s sexual attraction and not to act upon it, but NOT TO FEEL IT - impossible.

Again, it’s possible to abstain from sex and practice celibacy, but we’d still feel sexual attraction then, just won’t act upon it. It’s possible to abstain from sex with other people and only masturbate, but we’d still feel sexual attraction then and even somewhat act upon it (masturbating). But I don’t really think it’s possible NOT TO HAVE a sexual attraction (unless you’re a sterilized/castrated eunuch/tranny).

So what the hell the Woke mean by ‘asexuals’ then? I guess they meant voluntary celibate people, who for various reasons decided to abstain from sex. Basically, asexuals are Woke monks who had turned their celibacy into their sexual identity.

Why do those Woke asexuals abstain from sex when most of them aren’t religious even? Well, for various reasons. I had known few people who ‘identified’ as asexuals, and they told me of their reasons. Some of them didn’t want to ‘objectify’ other people, and sexual action is an objectification for them. Others felt dirty after having sex and didn’t want to feel that way anymore. Others indeed had certain traumas and/or issues with their bodies.

Either way, Woke term ‘asexual’ is misleading, just like pretty much every other Woke term. There are NO ‘asexuals’ - just voluntary or involuntary celibates. Just like there are NO transgenders because no one could transcend their biology - only dysphoriac people dissatisfied with their bodies and/or genitals.

So, again, the Woke redefined celibates into asexuals and created a new sexual identity. It’s what they do - corrupt language and ‘redefine’ everything to push their agenda. Another Woke pattern is to turn mental conditions or just behavioral patterns and choices into a ‘protected’ identity. They especially love to do it with sexual things because I guess the Woke are obsessed with sex for some reason.

Either way, see through the Woke fraud. Don’t use their slang. With regard to asexuals, I have nothing against voluntary celibate people, but it’s simply their choice and behavioral pattern, and NOT any ‘protected’ sexual identity.