Woke Agreeability and 'Safe Spaces'

Absence of Disagreement Breeds Extremism

Before I exposed Woke split personality - e.g., how differently they act in real life and on social media - as a result of their extreme cowardice and exaggerated nicety. Same cowardice and nicety breed another Woke landmark feature - their extreme agreeability. 

Wokesters indeed are VERY agreeable, and they need to ABSOLUTELY AGREE with other people on everything! Disagreeing they perceive as an insult, personal attack and even violence (yeah, it is THAT BAD!) Hence, the Woke are unable to both disagree with other people, or tolerate any disagreement with them. When the Woke are disagreed with, they feel insulted, offended, etc. - you know it all.

It's interesting that the Woke themselves cannot disagree with other people too, at least politely disagree. They either agree, or attack and insult another person. Again, it is pretty logical for them, because they perceive disagreement as an attack or insult, so, when they're disagreed with, or merely face another viewpoint, they begin to insult and offend in response. 

This also demonstrates another interesting Woke feature - Wokies CANNOT POSSIBLY even CONCEIVE of a thought that, well, they themselves might be wrong and their opponents might be right, or that BOTH might have some valid points. Nope, for the Woke, they're absolutely correct on everything by default, while their opponents are absolutely wrong on everything. This is actually also an incredible Woke Arrogance. 

But WHY is it so? HOW did the Woke come to this? The answer is the same as with their split personality - cowardice, nicety and social media led to this extreme agreeability. Because Wokies are cowards, they're AFRAID to provoke another person's ire by disagreeing with them, and, hence, prefer to agree. In addition, since Wokies are NICE, ironically, they don't want to hurt and offend another person by disagreeing with them, and also prefer to agree. This peculiar attitude also stems from Woke misconception of disagreement. Due to their extreme cowardice and nicety, the Woke perceive mere disagreement as an attack or insult, while in reality it's neither. 

Since the Woke avoid disagreement at any cost, they seek 'safe spaces' and bubbles when everyone would be agreeing with them. Social media provide those spaces for them. But those bubbles and echo chambers serve to endlessly reinforce Woke opinions, and, thus, to radicalize them and to make them extremists. Hence, ironically, safe spaces the Woke seek out of their exaggerated cowardice and nicety, turn them into the opposite of what they were - nasty bullies and extremists who relentlessly bully anyone they disagree with. 

But how Woke 'nicety and cowardice' allow that? Well, again, since the Woke perceive ANY disagreement as a personal attack, insult or even violence, they feel need to DEFEND themselves against this perceived 'violence' - hence, they attack. Pretty logical for them. Social media and their bubble reinforce their alleged 'hurt' they got out of disagreement and alleged 'hatred' of the person who dared to disagree with them, to tremendous extent, and as result you get an extreme Woke reaction. Again, knowing how it works, Woke behavior looks even LOGICAL (although completely wrong).

But why are the Woke convinced that the're 100% correct on everything while their opponents - not? It's not exactly that. The point is that for the Woke, disagreement is NOT 'another viewpoint', it's 'hatred and violence'. And, ofc, haters who resort to violence are wrong and evil by default. Hence the Woke extreme hostility towards them. 

Hence, here you see how a very tragic process. Initially good things - nicety, unwillingness to engage into conflicts and to hurt other people - leads to truly catastrophic results. It forces people to seek echo chambers and 'safe spaces. where everyone agrees with them, which in turn radicalizes them and turns them into dangerous violent extremists incapable of tolerating ANY disagreement.

Here is the proof WHY we should ALWAYS have a space for disagreement - it prevents us from getting radicalized. Normally, social interaction with different kinds of people at school, work, etc., which brings together different groups of people, prevented people from getting into the bubble. But social media changed that. Social media were able to create those 'safe spaces' and bubbles, and then people just transferred them to work and schools as well. Truly horrible.

Again, we NEED a disagreement and healthy debate. It might feel a little uncomfortable, yea, but who says that we should be perfectly comfortable EVERY minute of our lives? It's luxury. And luxury, by the way, just like 'safe spaces', never led to ANYTHING GOOD.