Why Globalization is So Dangerous

There is Nowhere to Escape a Global Concentration Camp

Originally I had written this piece two years ago on the background of COVID vax mandates and global digital concentration camp our elite was building based on them. Now it’s still relevant though because of upcoming Pandemic Treaty, possible climate lockdowns and who knows what else.

Original Article

Many people are aware that globalization is dangerous and instinctively resist it but not many of them realize just how bad it is. And nope, I'm not speaking of mass illegal immigration (though it's not that great either). However, mass immigration is just a byproduct of globalization, and not its real goal. What is real point of globalization we all had seen with COVID pandemic when EXACTLY THE SAME POLICIES were pushed down on almost every country in the world via the authority of international organizations like WHO, 'world class experts' like Dr Fauci, and biggest media outlets. Any country which tried to choose its own way to handle the pandemic like Sweden, UK or Russia, was harshly critisized by all media, 'top experts' and 'international community', and bullied into obedience - e.g., following the exactly same Party line with lockdowns, masks and then mass vaccination. And this was exactly the biggest problem - that the SAME policies were pushed down on everyone, and that national states weren't left any choice how to fight this pandemic.

Now, despite all research and evidence, you might disagree with me that lockdowns, masks and mass vaccination were the wrong and actually harmful policies, but believe them to be pretty helpful and 'life saving'. Then, if you believe those policies to be not that bad, you might not see anything bad in literally every country adopting them as well. Whatever, I'm not gonna argue about that now. However, what if policies which even ON YOUR SCALE are pretty bad and harmful, would be pushed down on every country, on the whole world, via authority of international organizations and media? After all, if there's a 'global governance' which you cheered on yourselves, then the world would be governed globally, from the one center, and everyone would be adopting the same policies, just like it was with COVID. It would be nice if those policies would be good, but what if they would be pretty bad, what shall we do then? What shall we do if this center of 'global governance' would go absolutely corrupt (and I believe it's already corrupt beyond measure)?

Now, why the system of independent sovereign national states is so much better than this 'global governance', or authority of international organizations and 'world class experts' overruling national sovereignty of every country. Let's say some countries, or national states, would go corrupt and/or dictatorial (like Russia or China). Then oppressed citizens of those countries still can escape to other, more democratic and less corrupt countries. This is how it was happening for the last twenty years for example - say oppressed Russians and Iranians emigrated to the West and started new lives here. This is the main benefit of the system we had before COVID and globalization. If any country went corrupt and evil, then its citizens always had an opportunity to escape to a better place. And it's highly unlikely that all countries in the world would go corrupt at the same time so there would be nowhere to escape.

Now, how 'global governance' compares to that? If international organizations which rule us all went corrupt and pushed evil policies on the whole world (and no country has sovereignty enough to overrule international rulings), then WHERE WOULD WE ESCAPE THEN? There would be nowhere to go. The whole world would be living under the totalitarian dictatorship of international organizations which went rampant, and no one could oppose them since they would have the highest authority. National sovereignty and national states would cease to matter. Only international, global entities and institutions would decide. Do you see now finally why is it that bad and dangerous?

Now, if you'd strain your brain a bit more, could you answer who would even WANT this system of 'global governance' when national states decide nothing and international organizations rule us all? Certainly, this system does not look that good for the countries as independent entities. It's not that great for people either as I had shown, since in this case the entire world population would be at the mercy of just one entity which 'globally governs them all', just like Sauron in the Lord of the Rings. Then who would even want this system? Right, the largest transnational corporations, just like Big Pharma or Big Tech. Those corporations had already 'transcended' any national borders after all. They have also enough money to buy all international organizations and major media outlets, so to rule us all via them.

So do you see now what globalization really is? It's the rule of largest international corporations whose interests are lobbied via all international organizations and media. It's also a trap for the world population since corporate interests have nothing to do with people's interests, they aren't even overlapping. And people have nowhere to escape to in this 'global world' since every country does the corporate bidding and adopts exactly same policies. It won't be a 'global paradise' as its propagandists are telling you. Well, it will be a paradise for the largest transnational corporations, to be sure. For everyone else it would be a global nightmare.