Ukrainian Psy Op - Real NATO and Putin's Goals
Neither Putin nor the West are Failing in Ukraine - Their REAL Goals are Just Different from Declared Ones
I’m again republishing my last year article on Ukrainian psy op to clarify my ‘taking no sides’ position in this war and also as a possible guide to upcoming peace.
Original Article
Western propaganda loves to tell how 'miserably' Putin fares in Ukraine having failed not only to occupy Ukraine but even to defeat Ukrainian army. Similarly, Russian propaganda loves to tell how equally miserably the West failed to both isolate Russia and crush Russian economy with its sanctions which are instead backfired on the West itself. So, propaganda on each side keeps telling us how 'miserably' other side had failed to cheer their respective populations on so they would easier accept this perpetual war. It's easier to accept it when you're told that you're ‘winning’ and it's other side who is losing, right?
But I'm not buying that both West and Russia are failing for almost two years (the West with its sanctions, Putin with his military) and still did NIL to change their respective strategies. Nope, if they still are doing the same shit over and over again, it's NOT because they're failing. It's because their real goals are different from proclaimed ones.
Indeed, if we look closer, we have no actual grounds to claim that neither Putin failed with its 'special military operation' in Ukraine nor the West had failed with its anti-Russian sanctions. Again, to claim that they'd failed we need to be sure that we KNOW their real goals, and, hence, could estimate whether they achieved these goals or not. But the point is that in truth WE DO KNOW THEIR REAL GOALS - neither Putin's nor Western political elite's. And their proclaimed goals might actually differ from their real ones significantly.
Putin’s Real Goals in Ukraine
Let's take Putin's goals for a starter. First of all, Putin had never officially claimed that he wants to 'occupy Ukraine'. This goal was entirely made up by Western propaganda machine and assigned to him. The logic here is pretty basic - if Putin invades another country, then it's ‘pretty logical’ he wants to occupy its land? Actually, it's NOT. Remember how many times US had invaded other countries during last decades, and occupation of their land NEVER was an American goal. So why should it be Putin's?
Officially Putin claimed that his goals were 'demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine'. But those goals are pretty vague and unclear and could mean anything. Similarly, later Putin's claims that he wants to 'protect Russian-speaking population in Ukraine' might mean anything - from getting certain guarantees with regards to their safety and non-discrimination from Ukrainian government to joining Ukrainian regions with Russian-speaking population to Russia. Or it might mean even taking most of Ukrainian Russian-speaking population to Russia as refugees. In all of those cases, their 'protection' would be ensured. Again, pretty vague and unclear goal.
So, in truth we actually HAVE NO IDEA of ACTUAL Putin's goals and can only guess. Hence, all the goals which were ascribed to Putin in the West are no more than Western biased conjectures. Even Russians have no idea of Putin's real goals and don't see the sense of this 'special military operation' of his. But if we do not know Putin's real goals, how can we confidently claim that Putin is FAILING?
Now, I think I have my own conjecture of Putin's real goals. I already stated it many times - I believe that Putin started this war under orders from Western billionaire elite from Davos, secretly colluding with them against his own people. I also told you why - to facilitate their fucking Great Reset via energy crisis and global hunger this war would create, and to drain and bleed his own country, Russia, as a side bonus. And if I'm correct, then Putin is actually NOT failing with his goals. His goals all along were just different from what he himself claimed or from what we ascribed to him. But in truth, Putin was given a task by Western billionaire elite to START this war and then to MAKE IT A LONG-TERM MILITARY CONFLICT to facilitate their agenda of 'perpetual war instead of 'perpetual pandemic'. And if that were real Putin goals, then he greatly succeeded with BOTH, at the expense of his people of whom he never really cared anyway.
Real Goals of Western Sanctions against Russia
Now, let's take Western sanctions. On the surface it seems that their obvious goal was to isolate Russia and to crush Russian economy. But WAS IT REALLY though? Western political elite isn't dumb, and they should have been well aware of the fact that to fully isolate such big country and important international player like Russia is next to impossible. Similarly, they were fully aware that they simply DO NOT POSSESS TOOLS to really crush Russian economy because again Russia has way too many resources (and not only energy ones). Hence, it's next to impossible to crush such big and rich country and such important international player like Russia with ANY SANCTIONS! And I maintain that the West again knew it all along, and the real purpose of implementing anti-Russian sanctions was very different from the proclaimed one.
Which was this real purpose? Well, smoke and mirrors first of all. To create an illusion of 'new Cold War' which suits plans of Western elite for now. Because again, Russia and nuclear war are much better boogiemen for Western population than COVID and climate taken together, and, hence, can be much better used to keep Western population under control, to deprive it from its basic freedoms and human rights and to put them into digital concentration camp. Just tell Western people a magic phrase 'Russian threat' and do whatever you like with them. Profit.
But there is one more purpose of Western anti-Russian sanctions, more practical one this time. Western elite is currently testing on Russia potential powerful tools to crush rebellious countries who in the future might potentially rebel against say WHO pandemic fascism or WEF climate fascism. Then, the West would turn all the tremendous power of all those sanctions well tested on Russia against them, and force them to comply with any climate or pandemic fascism. Profit.
But wait, some people would say, if those Western sanctions failed on Russia, how can be effective against another countries? Indeed, Western sanctions would be next to useless against the BIGGEST players in this world - e.g., US, Canada, Russia, China, India, Brazil. Hence, those countries need to join WEF global fascist system VOLUNTARILY. If at least one of these big players would be out, WEF global fascism will not pass. But this far, all those countries are in. Even Russia - despite starting a war in Ukraine, Russia still last year officially pledged its allegiance to Bill Gates' funded WHO and their 'pandemic plans', and still plans to implement digital IDs and digital currency - another WEF agenda. This actually also proves unambiguously that Russia is still in league with WEF billionaire elite and that 'new Cold War' is yet another political scam, just like 'COVID pandemic' or 'climate emergency'.
Hence, Western sanctions are indeed useless against biggest players like Russia or China. However, small countries can be completely crushed by them. Hence, if say some African or Asian or Latin American or even European dissident country would refuse to join in WHO pandemic fascism or WEF climate one, the West would unleash their sanctions on them and force them to comply. Profit. After all, all those sanctions and their mechanism were tested well on Russia.
The Real Purpose of Sending Western Weapons to Ukraine
With testing things, this is another point of endlessly sending more and more weapons to Ukraine. The West ofc doesn't give a shit of Ukraine and not even of Russia I suspect. The REAL purpose of sending more and more, and EACH TIME DIFFERENT kind of (last time it was tanks) weapons to Ukraine for the West is again to TEST THE POWER OF WESTERN WEAPONRY in Ukraine! Why to test it? Again, to be able to use it against dissenting countries unwilling to join in Western climate or pandemic planned global fascism in the future. Because you know, some countries might persist in defying the West and its neo fascism despite Western sanctions. Against those, military invasion would be used. Hence, Western weapons need to be tested. And luckily here is Ukraine for this purpose.
Ofc, Western invasion would be possible only into small countries who do not possess nuclear weapons and not into big nuclear powers. But isn't it kinda what the West was doing for ALL LAST DECADES with impunity - invading poor weak and small countries like Iraq, Libya, Syria and even Serbia with impunity? Sigh.
So, if you'd look at Ukrainian war from this viewpoint, things are kinda clearer aren't they? Neither Putin nor the West are failing in this conflict. In the contrary, they had succeeded perfectly, but with DIFFERENT goals from the ones proclaimed to us peasants. This explains well enough why they keep doing the same seemingly inefficient shit for almost a year in a row.
Flags and what they mean
Single-coloured flags = world power, regional power with the right to control the world, region
Vertically striped flags = conditional right to have a say
Horizontally striped flags = shut up, someone else is giving you the orders
The USA is not a world power, the USA is a tool
China is a world power
Israel is a world power
The Vatican is a world power
Switzerland is a world power (Incidentally, only the Vatican and Switzerland have square flags)
Saudi Arabia is a world power
....
Russia switched to horizontally striped flags in 1990
Libya was a regional power until Gaddafi rebelled against the hegemon
....
You can understand a lot of this
And please never forget that world powers are not necessarily military in nature but are often control centres
Wars are a very opaque mixture of endless interests. All sorts of free riders quickly jump on the event. Weapons lobby, stock market speculation, geopolitical interests, IMF interests in privatization, weapons tests, etc.
I also see it this way: wars are mainly there to create chaos. The real goals of the Putin network are indeed opaque. Russia is suffering more than one might think. But this is also because there are internal opponents to the Putin network. Let's just take the Russian central bank as an example. It has raised interest rates enormously (21% 11/2024) and made loans immensely more expensive.
War has strange rules
Russia has proven that it has superior weapons. But they are still conventional weapons. It has been known for decades that there is a whole spectrum of psychotronic and energetic weapons (energetic, because they do not fit into the category of electromagnetic nature). BUT they are not used. Instead, completely conventional war is being waged. It is a slaughter of the quality of the First World War. Both sides are sitting in trenches and shooting each other with machine guns and grenades.
The only new thing is that drones are being used today - terrible for soldiers. On the one hand, tanks are easily put out of action and on the other, trenches are completely pointless. Soldiers on both sides are often completely helpless against the drones.
I always call it military folklore, because other weapons are available - but they are not used. Why? I don't know and can only speculate. Do people not want to show their real weapons? Or is it what I call "strange rules" of war. By that I mean an unwritten rule that people have agreed to wage folkloristic war.
The Great Reset is in the air and what we see publicly is the Hegelian dialectic.
We see the two warring parties. What we don't see is the invisible coordinator who exercises "structureless control". The unstructured control for the soldiers and residents is: That's where the enemy is. It's like the Mission & Vision system in which people act independently within this framework. They don't even know for what real interests they are doing this.
We know that the invisible global hegemons want to completely control humanity. They are working on several issues. But primarily on the "digital prison" and the expropriation of all people.
The effects of the wars in Ukraine, Gaza, Lebanon and Syria are that the financial system is being brought more and more in the direction of the 1930s. If everything collapses, then the hegemons will have maximum power. Then the world can be completely redesigned.
Because the hegemons distrust each other, they act in a hybrid mode. On the one hand, they weaken themselves. On the other hand, they strengthen their country. This can now be clearly seen in Russia and the USA. The Putin network is excellent at creating a collective consciousness among the population. Making it so closed that immense energies can be mobilized in an emergency. In the USA, the Trump network is doing the same thing and calling it MAGA.
Europe plays a special role
All the wars, especially the one in Ukraine, have a major geopolitical effect - the EU is being destroyed to the maximum. No "major bloc" suffers more than the European one. The Anglo-Saxon, Chinese and Russian blocs are not regressing. In terms of hegemony, the USA and China are more closely linked than one might think. China has developed and tested everything it needs for the digital prison. It can be rolled out quickly when the time comes.
Whether Russia will be involved or not is not yet completely clear. A war is also raging within Russia between two hegemons. A western-oriented hegemon and a Russian hegemon. Officially, Russia and China are working together. But that could change at some point. Russia is a great unknown. It seems to me that Russia has the most modern and secret weapons. They also seem to have the smartest minds at the moment.
Russia is the center of the heartland ideology. There have been attempts to take over this heartland for ages. That is why Russia is to be divided and colonized. The rapprochement between Western Europe and Russia was stopped by the war. Friendly cooperation was prevented. It is the heartland ideology that Western Europe and Russia must remain separate. Because the ideology says that a united heartland would rule the world.
Capital of Cryptos
Trump has set the goal. CBDC is difficult to implement BUT the voluntary move into cryptos will work. Blockchain money is the main element of the digital prison.
Time
Not much will happen in the course of a few years. Everything will take decades. Generations, with the target date of 2100. The preparations were made in the 1990s. Among other things, the founding of the EU and especially the ECB, which has organized a flood of money and debt chaos since its founding.
We the people
are the deciding factor. We have to create our own consciousness. We have to become the true sovereign following the Swiss model.
We have to create the decentralized system and infrastructure (which is just beginning with Web3) in order to be sovereign.
Let's see the reality - the hegemons are extremely weak. They only have a mind but no hands to make a difference. Without us they are NOTHING. Without our hands they are nothing BUT they know very well how to work for them - with money - without really noticing it. Who produces the weapons? If people become sovereign, then they will only look at the weapons factories from the outside.
Btw., I recommend taking a look at this data
https://fct-altai.ru/
It is interesting that this site even exists as a purely German and French site. The Russian hegemon focuses heavily on the "Germans" (https://fktdeutsch.wordpress.com/). German comes from teutsch and means "people". And that does not include "Teutschland" but the entire German-speaking area: Switzerland, Austria, northern Italy, western France, Luxembourg, southern Denmark, parts of Belgium and the Netherlands, Germany. In a broader sense, it is about the Roman Empire, which was abolished in 1800. One should also not forget that France was once called the Empire of the Franks. The Franks from Central Europe. And isn't it exciting that the English are also called Anglo-Saxons. Well, the Saxons also come from Central Europe.
Western Europe has always been the scene of huge shifts in power through dynasties that have existed for thousands of years. For example, the Habsburg dynasty, a dynasty of many popes, has existed for 1,000 years. The Vatican took over the Roman Empire in 320 and exported the system of rule to the entire world. Just look at the Carolingian and Merovingian dynasties. Why is the Merovingian the main character in the film Matrix!
We know too little about the past
But we know that we must be sovereign.