Obvious Connection Between Tucker-Putin Interview and Alexey Navalny Death

Precise Timing Makes It No Coincidence

Let us connect some dots. Controversial Tucker-Putin interview is released on 8th of February and has a bombshell effect on Western (especially American!) audience. Then, just almost a WEEK after this interview, on 16th of February, Alexey Navalny is found dead in prison under suspicious circumstances. Again, connection between those two events is obvious for ANYONE who can think!

Ofc, gullible idiots would scream 'Coincidence!' as they always do when they're reluctant to accept some causality they don't like. But smart part of us knows that there are NO COINCIDENCES in politics, and even less so when events in question happen in the SAME COUNTRY and almost STRAIGHT one after another. No, there's 100% connection and even CAUSALITY between those two events.

Causality I said? Yeah! It's obvious that SOMETHING which was said on Tucker-Putin interview or behind its candelabra had doomed Alexey. Our task is to determine, what and how. Now, it's a pretty safe assumption and good logic to say that Tucker came to interview Putin NOT on his own but as an unofficial Trump Envoy. Obviously, Trump couldn't do something like that OPENLY before the election, hence it was said that Tucker was acting on his own, but it was equally obvious he wasn't.

Now, WHY did Trump send Tucker to Putin? The reason is also obvious - to discuss upcoming peace agreement between US and Russia in Ukraine, its terms and conditions. This is what was really discussed behind the candelabra of this interview. It's safe to assume that Tucker proposed to Putin Trump peace conditions, Putin had accepted them and via Tucker sent to Trump his own conditions. Apparently, Trump had accepted them too, and upcoming peace agreement on Ukraine was ALMOST a settled matter.

It's also clear now WHY Tucker interview was so soft and why Tucker didn't ask Putin any tough and sharp questions. Not because Tucker is a traitor and Russian asset as I wrongly assumed before, and even less so because he was just too dumb or cowardice to ask them. No, just the POINT of Tucker's interview was DIFFERENT. The point was to PRESENT Putin's viewpoint before the Western audience, NOT to challenge Putin!

Why? Well, to prepare Western public to upcoming peace agreement in Ukraine. You would probably agree with that me that while in mainstream Western political discourse Putin is presented solely as a 'war criminal, genocidal monster and literally Hitler 2.0', to even CONSIDER a peace agreement with SUCH a person would largely NOT be accepted by Western public after two years of unhinged Russophobic propaganda. That's why, it was ESSENTIAL to whitewash Putin at least a LITTLE BIT before proposing such an agreement. That was the point of Tucker interview.

Obviously, no one in the West would have completely forgiven Putin or justified his invasion into Ukraine even after Tucker interview. But Western people would have perhaps understood Putin's grievances and proclaimed reasons somewhat BETTER, and, hence, his invasion would have looked less monstrous and unprovoked in Western eyes from now on. And, since their opponent was once again a HUMAN BEING with his own grievances instead of genocidal monster and Hitler 2.0, it would have been MORE ACCEPTABLE to make a peace agreement with him. That is, Putin was obviously wrong to invade Ukraine, but he had his reasons and his grievances, so perhaps we should just forget all those grievances and make peace instead. Makes sense.

OK, what all those ruminations have to do with Alexey Navalny death? OK, so it's clear now that a peace agreement between US and Russia was secretly forged on Tucker's interview, and interview itself served to prepare a Western audience for it by whitewashing Putin to a degree so it would be largely acceptable for Western public to make this peace with him. Now, let us say that some other parties in the West - American Demon Rats, chief war hawks, American military industry and NATO officials as well - are NOT happy with this sudden development. They do NOT want peace, they want a perpetual war instead!

I mean American military industry gets billions of dollars on this money-laundering war. NATO increases its role and its importance in the world. Demon Rats can use this war as their pathway to election victory in 2024.So, all of these parties do NOT want peace which would ruin it all. They want war to continue. Hence, they URGENTLY need to do something to sabotage Trump-Tucker peace efforts.

Now, WHAT could be a better sabotage than murder of the most famous Russian opposition leader, Alexey Navalny? The blame would be easily put on Kremlin, and Putin's whitewashing attempted by Tucker's interview would miserably fail. Any upcoming peace negotiations would be OUT OF QUESTION anymore. After all, how could you negotiate with a monster who brutally murders his helpless and already imprisoned chief political opponent and critic? So, the peace agreement is sabotaged and the perpetual war continues to the utter delight of the 'war party'.

By the way, I'm not saying that this 'war party' who really murdered Alexey is necessarily NATO and American Democrats. It might be also that Russian military generals who equally profit on war and whose importance had significantly grew after the start of the war decided to take matters into their own hands upon seeing that Kremlin is ready to backtrack on war. After all, for Russian military generals it was EASIER to murder Alexey in Russian prison than for the Western powers who needed to have their agents inside Russia in order to gain an access to Alexey in prison.

Also, it might be China or Iranian Islamists (via their agent Chechen Islamist Ramzan Kadyrov) who are behind Alexey murder. After all, the break up between Russia and the West is very beneficial for China and Islamists since it pushes both Russia and the West into their embrace more. That is, the West now needs to rely on Gulf countries oil instead of Russian one, and on trade with China. Russia, in turn, would be selling its gas and oil to China instead of the West, and help Islamist causes say in Israel too. So, China and Islamists aren't happy at the prospect of peace between Russia and the West. Hence, they might have assassinated Alexey Navalny as well.

The one thing is clear however - most likely it was NOT Kremlin who had done that. And I'm saying it NOT as 'Putin's spy', heh, but because it just makes no sense for Kremlin! Because Putin actually WANTED peace in Ukraine, otherwise he might have just rejected Tucker with his peace offers.