Nine Most Prominent Features of Demon Rats and Woketards

How to Distinguish a Blue Voter even if They Pretend to be Independent

Since many blue voters now falsely claim to be ‘independent’ (apparently, they are not as proud of their partisanship as they were back in 2020), we need to learn to spot their true political affiliation straight away so not to waste too much of our precious time on them.

There are few very notable features which appear in almost all of Media Narratives believers. I even made man entire list of them. I started collecting items for this list already back in 2021 but even my three-year old observations are still poignantly relevant today. So, here goes the list.

1) Those people regurgitate popular opinions almost word to word (you have an impression that you're reading a CNN article while listening to them), while they claim that they form 'an informed opinion' based on 'trustworthy sources'. Only for some reason, all those 'informed opinions' are absolutely identical, word-to-word, which makes them look rather like a copycat than an 'informed opinion', and all those 'trustworthy sources' are somehow Left affiliated (while all conservative sources are 'fake news').

2) Those people are narcissists absolutely confident of their opinions, and don't allow even slightest disagreement. That proves that they indeed live in a bubble where everyone thinks exactly just they do, which probably increases their confidence tenfold.

3) They label any disagreement, even fact-based, as 'wild conspiracy' and 'misinformation'. Indeed, if their opinion is based on 'science and trustworthy sources', and everyone in their bubble thinks just like they do, you must be a 'wild conspiracy theorist' to think otherwise.

4) Those people are completely incapable of critical thinking and of ANY thinking at all in my view. They are unable to put two and two together on their own without their media pointing it out to them. They are unable to make logical conclusions on their own based on facts, and they can’t even check facts for themselves on the ORIGINAL SOURCES, not in their media interpretation.

Examples are multitude. It's pretty obvious for anyone who can think logically that Western Leftist anti-Israel hatred and pro-Hamas propaganda had caused new wave of Antisemitism in the West. Narrative believers are unable to connect these two facts because their media are reluctant to do it for them (because oh well, it undermines their narrative). It was pretty suspicious for anyone with a brain in their heads that COVID emerged from Wuhan, the same town where the virology lab was located, and yet narrative believers labeled anyone who dared even to voice out this suspicion 'wild conspiracy theorist', and 'racist' in addition just because their media told them so. These people are incapable to spot the hypocrisy of Western Woke corporations who pretend to support gay rights in the Western world but cater to extreme homophobia in Islamic world.

So, to conclude, these people would believe anything their media and 'experts' told them. They can't even count to ten on their own without media help I have a feeling. Oh my.

5) Those people trust every establishment word because well, establishment is 'trustworthy'. It can't be corrupt by default, right. The fact that establishment and elites are usually rich and powerful, and hence care for their money and power most of all, somehow escapes narrative believers.

6) These people claim to be pro-Science while in truth they are pro-Scientific Establishment

Science is not WHO and Dr Fauci and other so-called 'top experts' who are rich and might be corrupt and have their own conflict of interests. Every PhD doctor, for example, is also scientist, and their opinion shouldn't matter nil compared to Fauci's. Science is much more complex and diverse body, and certainly not something which is made authoritarian cult of.

7) Those people very rarely do any actual fact-check

They trust their media and experts by default, if they have a 'good reputation'. They won't normally look what other sources, perhaps in other countries, tell of the particular news if CNN article told them something already. They'd trust CNN. They won't normally Google any medical info themselves or even check official COVID statistics for themselves (which is available for free), if Dr Fauci had told them what to do already. This is despite the multiple proven failures, incompetence, misleading advise and sometimes downright lies by WHO and Fauci which now come to light more and more. This is despite the fact that even Wikipedia blames CNN for highly partisan and selective news coverage and refers to few proven CNN controversies. Oh my, but these people's faith in their establishment heroes never falters despite all evidence.

8) These people's approach is very biased and one-sided (like with Trump or Israel), their worldview is pretty black and white, and they are not even bothered by it because everyone in their bubble thinks just as they do. While it would bother every rational person if in some narrative one side is portrayed as absolutely evil while another - as absolutely good.

9) These people's approach is usually very emotional as well. They translate the outrage against certain countries or figures (Trump, Bolsonaro, Russia, Israel) which was manufactured by establishment and its media propaganda. You could even tell that they don't feel this outrage themselves and it was implanted into their minds by media propaganda because they speak in exactly the same cliched words. True emotion doesn't manifest itself like that.

So, to conclude, those people regurgitate popular opinions word-to-word without any second thought. They are unable to think critically and even to connect together two known facts without their media and experts making the connection for them. They claim that they are so pro-Science while in truth they are pro Establishment. They claim that they believe 'trustworthy sources' while their 'trustworthy sources' are again rich establishment sources. Their narrative is very emotional (usually in negative way), and they operate in the realm of feelings, not facts. They have very one-sided and biased picture, their worldview is very simplified, primitive and lack-and-white. It's incredibly funny on this background that they consider their 'perspective' to be 'pretty nuanced, objective and complex'. Just as their perspective is 'independent and informed', right. Indeed, human stupidity doesn't know any limits.