New 'Weak Tyrant' Political Model

Weak Puppet Tyrants as a Very Useful Tool for Our Billionaire Elite

Weak Tyrant, or Puppet-Tyrant as a new Tyrant Type of Modern Age: Examples of Joe Biden and Sanna Marin

We need to reconsider the archetype of an authoritarian tyrant/dictator as of a strong, pushy and dominant person, more often male than female (like Putin or Trump, though might be an 'Iron Lady' like Margaret Thatcher as well). This type is no longer relevant for the modern world, at least for its Western part. Instead, we have a new type of tyrants now - corrupt and weak ones who lack a backbone, like Joe Biden in US or Sanna Marin in Finland. The main danger of those tyrants lies exactly in their weakness which makes them corrupt, easily bought and very susceptible to any external influence and peer pressure. That is, exactly because of their lack of a backbone, those tyrants can be either easily bought by the external force (like transnational corporations) or pressured into doing what this external force wants.

Well, in this case they're just puppets, one might say, why to still call them tyrants then? Because they still rule the whole countries, and still might make their citizens miserable. Only they would do it not on their own volition but at their corporate masters' bidding, but they would do it nevertheless. The actual tyrants behind the curtain would be those global elites, billionaires and corporations, ofc, but those weak 'world leaders' without a backbone, their puppets, would be the tyrants whom we'd see on stage, and who would deliver to us the evil orders of their masters. This is how the modern tyranny works: the most powerful players, our actual overlords, like Big Pharma and Big Tech billionaires and corporations, buy the weak 'world leaders' to deliver their will.

That's why actually the image of a strong-willed, somewhat dominant politician with a backbone is so much discredited in our societies by mainstream media and state propaganda. Because you see, our actual corporate overlords are afraid of strong leaders, they're not as easily bought or pressured into obedience as the weak ones. They might actually resist and even dare to deliver people's will instead of corporate one. That's why it's better to get rid of them. Trump in US and Bolsonaro in Brazil, who, despite all their shortcomings, were/are independent of global corporate elite and were trying to deliver actual public will against corporate agenda. That's why our corporate overlords hated them so much and set such a ruthless smearing campaign against them in all major media outlets (whom they had already bought by then, ofc). When you look at it from this angle, modern politics starts to make much more sense, doesn't it?

Now, after seeing the example of strong leaders hated by corporate overlords and their media, let's look at the particular examples of those weak tyrants whom they want to see more as the 'world leaders'. Joe Biden in US and Sanna Marin in Finland are perfect examples of it. Biden in his essence as a politician is a complete zero: he was in politics for over fifty years and achieved nothing aside from being someone's sidekick. Nothing apart from amassing huge amounts of money for himself and his family, ofc. So here we could see who Biden really is: a weak and corrupt mediocrity, good for nothing but to be a sidekick obeying someone's orders. On the other hand, Biden was long enough in politics to become memorable and recognizable. That, alongside his weakness and corruption, makes him just a PERFECT PUPPET. Weak, corrupt, popular among people - what's the better combination for it?

Indeed, Biden is a perfect puppet, literally everybody's puppet at this point. He's the puppet of Big Pharma and Big Tech corporations who use him to push for their cherished vaccine fascism and digital mass surveillance. H's also the puppet of radical 'progressive' Woke elements inside his own Democratic party who use him to push their radical, divisive, hateful and fraudulent agenda - Anti-Semitic 'pro-Palestine' agenda, trans radicalism with hormones for kids and all that, Woke racism disguised as 'anti-racism' with Critical Race Theory and all that. I think even Taliban had sensed Biden's weakness and played him as a fool in Afghanistan. Now Putin plays Biden as a fool as well. So Biden is literally everybody's puppet.

Yet, despite his undeniable weakness, Biden has a lot of power which Presidential office in US gives him. Hence, he's capable of fucking up lives of millions of Americans which he had already done by many of his executive orders bypassing the Congress. He had harmed lives of millions of Afghans as well. So, here's a paradox of weak tyrant - an absolute weakling, everybody's puppet, Joe Biden, yet has a tremendous power over lives of millions of people. And he's abusing this power, even if not on his own volition but at his masters' bidding, still. This is the danger of the Weak Tyrants, or Puppet-Tyrants as I call them.

Sanna Marin in Finland is another good example of a puppet-tyrant. She's also a combination of popular and weak person. Her young age, her good looks (we still live in the straight patriarchy if good looks give a woman such tremendous power!) and her 'progressive' stance made her popular among Finnish people. Her weakness and lack of experience made her corrupt and susceptible to any external influences as well. Again, a perfect puppet!

Just like Joe Biden, Sanna Marin is everybody's puppet. She's the puppet of EU most notably - through her EU globalists push all Pharma fascism, disastrous immigration policies and other dangerous shit down on Finland. Also, she's a puppet of other politicians and political parties in Finland - I think Krista Kiuru in her own party and ambitious Green and National Coalition parties in addition to it. Sanna Marin herself knows nothing and thinks of nothing but her career. That's pretty dangerous combination as well. She's also pretty arrogant as such and a very good liar. That makes her even worse.

Again, Sanna Marin as Finnish Prime Minister has a lot of power and is capable of fucking up lives of millions of Finnish people for good. She had already done a lot of toxic shit which Finns would have to deal with for generations. She had repatriated adult Jihadists to Finland hence exposing Finns to Jihadist terror attacks in the future. She had marginalized and stigmatized millions of unvaccinated people in Finland by her fascist 'vaccine passports' policies against all THL actually scientific advise, and this new divide Finns would feel for generations after. She had damaged Finnish economy pretty seriously as well. So, Sanna Marin was capable of doing a lot of harm to Finland already, and worse is to come I believe. She's weak, but her office gives her a lot of power. This is the danger of weak tyrants again - their office makes them powerful, so their corporate masters could push their evil will through them.

What's the moral of what I am saying? Don't be afraid of strong-willed politicians with a backbone. They might be your salvation in the contrary because only they might have enough guts to resist peer pressure and hence to deliver people's will and not the corporate bidding. Instead, beware weak and popular politicians who lack a backbone like Joe Biden or Sanna Marin who are perfect puppets, and who would be inevitably bought/pressured by biggest corporate players to do all their bidding against public best interest. I mean, it's those weak leaders like Biden or Marin who had sold you all to Big Pharma and Big Tech corporations already. They would do anything for the sake of their careers. They would agree even to new Holocaust if it would mean a new promotion for them.

So these are the most dangerous people of our time - puppet-tyrants, weak world leaders. Without them, corporate Nazi wouldn't have been able to fulfill even half of their harmful and fascist policies. So beware them, mistrust them, don't vote them in any political office! If you see any weak leader, scorn them and chase them away. Even rude assholes like Trump are better if they have a backbone and guts enough to resist corporate pressure.