Neither Putin nor NATO are Failing in Ukraine

Their REAL Goals are Just Different from Declared Ones

NATO propaganda loves to tell how 'miserably' Putin fares in Ukraine having failed not only to occupy Ukraine but even to defeat Ukrainian army. Similarly, Kremlin propaganda loves to tell how equally miserably the West failed to both isolate Russia and crush Russian economy with its sanctions which are instead backfired on the West itself. So, propaganda on each side keeps telling us how 'miserably' other side had failed to cheer their respective populations on so they would easier accept this perpetual war. It's easier to accept it when you're told that you're winning and it's other side who is losing, right?

But I'm not buying that both NATO and Russia are failing for almost a year (the West with its sanctions, Putin with his military) and still did NIL to change their respective strategies! That would have been absurd, wouldn’t it? Nope, if they still are doing the same shit over and over again, it's NOT because they're failing. It's because their real goals are different from proclaimed ones.

Indeed, if we look closer, we have no actual grounds to claim that neither Putin failed with its 'special military operation' in Ukraine nor the West had failed with its anti-Russian sanctions. Again, to claim that they'd failed we need to be sure that we KNOW their real goals, and, hence, could estimate whether they achieved these goals or not. But the point is that in truth WE DO KNOW THEIR REAL GOALS - neither Putin's nor Western political elite's. And their proclaimed goals might actually differ from their real ones significantly.

Let's take Putin's goals for a starter. First of all, Putin had never officially claimed that he wants to 'occupy Ukraine'. This goal was entirely made up by Western propaganda and assigned to him. The logic here is pretty basic- if Putin invades another country, then it's logical he wants to occupy its land? Actually, it's NOT LOGICAL. Remember how many times US had invaded other countries during last decades, and occupation of their land NEVER was an American goal. So why should it be Putin's?

Officially Putin claimed that his goals were 'demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine'. But those goals are pretty vague and unclear and could mean anything. Similarly, later Putin's claims that he wants to 'protect Russian-speaking population in Ukraine' might mean anything - from getting certain guarantees with regards to their safety and non-discrimination from Ukrainian government to joining Ukrainian regions with Russian-speaking population to Russia. Or it might mean even taking most of Ukrainian Russian-speaking population to Russia as refugees. In all of those cases, their 'protection' would be ensured. Again, pretty vague and unclear goal.

So, in truth we actually HAVE NO IDEA of ACTUAL Putin's goals and can only guess. Hence, all the goals which were ascribed to Putin in the West are no more than Western biased conjectures. Even Russians have no idea of Putin's real goals and don't see the sense of this 'special military operation' of his. But if we do not know Putin's real goals, how can we confidently claim that Putin is FAILING?

Now, I think I have my own conjecture of Putin's real goals. I already stated it many times - I believe that Putin started this war under orders from Western billionaire elite from Davos, secretly colluding with them against his own people. I also told you why - to facilitate their fucking GreatReset via energy crisis and global hunger this war would create. And if I'm correct, then Putin is actually NOT failing with his goals. His goals all along were just different from what he himself claimed or from what we ascribed to him. But in truth, Putin was given a task by Western billionaire elite to START this war and then to MAKE IT A LONG-TERM MILITARY CONFLICT to facilitate their agenda of 'perpetual war instead of 'perpetual pandemic'. And if that were real Putin goals, then he greatly succeeded with BOTH, at the expense of his people of whom he never really cared anyway.

Now, let's take Western sanctions. On the surface it seems that their obvious goal was to isolate Russia and to crush Russian economy. But WAS IT REALLY though? Western political elite isn't dumb, and they should have been well aware of the fact that to fully isolate such big country and big international player like Russia is next to impossible. Similarly, they were fully aware that they simply DO NOT POSSESS TOOLS to really crush Russian economy because again Russia has way too many resources (and not only energy ones). Hence, it's next to impossible to crush such big and rich country and such important international player like Russia with ANY SANCTIONS! And I maintain that the West again knew it all along, and the real purpose of implementing anti-Russian sanctions was very different from the proclaimed one.

Which was this real purpose? Well, smoke and mirrors first of all. To create an illusion of 'new Cold War' which suits plans of Western elite for now. Because again, Russia and nuclear war are much better boogiemen for Western population than COVID and climate taken together, and, hence, can be much better used to keep Western population under control, to deprive it from its basic freedoms and human rights and to put them into digital concentration camp. Just tell Western people a magic phrase 'Russian threat' and do whatever you like with them. Profit.

But there is one more purpose of Western anti-Russian sanctions, more practical one this time. Western elite is currently testing on Russia potential powerful tools to crush rebellious countries who in the future might potentially rebel against say WHO pandemic fascism or WEF climate fascism. Then, the West would turn all the tremendous power of all those sanctions well tested on Russia against them, and force them to comply with any climate or pandemic fascism. Profit.

But wait, some people would say, if those Western sanctions failed on Russia, how can be effective against another countries? Indeed, Western sanctions would be next to useless against the BIGGEST players in this world - e.g., US, Canada, Russia, China, India, Brazil. Hence, those countries need to join WEF global fascist system VOLUNTARILY. If at least one of these big players would be out, WEF global fascism will not pass. But this far, all those countries are in. Even Russia - despite starting a war in Ukraine, Russia still last year officially pledged its allegiance to Bill Gates' funded WHO and their 'pandemic plans', and still plans to implement digital IDs and digital currency - another WEF agenda. This actually also proves unambiguously that Russia is still in league with WEF billionaire elite and that 'new Cold War' is yet another political scam, just like 'COVID pandemic' or 'climate emergency'.

Hence, Western sanctions are indeed useless against biggest players like Russia or China. However, small countries can be completely crushed by them. Hence, if say some African or Asian or Latin American or even European dissident country would refuse to join in WHO pandemic fascism or WEF climate one, the West would unleash their sanctions on them and force them to comply. Profit. After all, all those sanctions and their mechanism were tested well on Russia.

With testing things, this is another point of endlessly sending more and more weapons to Ukraine. The West ofc doesn't give a shit of Ukraine and not even of Russia I suspect. The REAL purpose of sending more and more, and EACH TIME DIFFERENT kind of (last time it was tanks) weapons to Ukraine for the West is again to TEST THE POWER OF WESTERN WEAPONRY in Ukraine! Why to test it? Again, to be able to use it against dissenting countries unwilling to join in Western climate or pandemic planned global fascism in the future. Because you know, some countries might persist in defying the West and its neo fascism despite Western sanctions. Against those, military invasion would be used. Hence, Western weapons need to be tested. And luckily here is Ukraine for this purpose.

Ofc, Western invasion would be possible only into small countries who do not possess nuclear weapons and not into big nuclear powers. But isn't it kinda what the West was doing for ALL LAST DECADES with impunity - invading poor weak and small countries like Iraq, Libya, Syria and even Serbia with impunity? Sigh.

So, if you'd look at Ukrainian war from this viewpoint, things are kinda clearer aren't they? Neither Putin nor the West are failing in this conflict. In the contrary, they had succeeded perfectly, but with DIFFERENT goals from the ones proclaimed to us peasants. This explains well enough why they keep doing the same seemingly inefficient shit for almost a year in a row.