How Did My Outlook on Ukraine Change
Inconsistencies and Contradictions of Ukrainian Propaganda were Always Obvious
It might sound weird for my subscribers who had read all my latest articles and notes on Ukraine but initially, straight after Putin’s invasion, I did even sympathize with Ukraine and supported Ukrainian people in their predicament (albeit very briefly, for two weeks max, but still), despite being a Russian. You see, I’m intrinsically pacifist and condemn all the wars and ‘military operations’ (including all the American military invasions, correct). So obviously I was shocked by the fact of open military aggression by Russian government, just like countless other people worldwide, Russians or Europeans or Americans or those not directly affected by the war.
However, just like with COVID scamdemic, very quickly it became clear that everything is not as it seems in this war, that it’s not as simple and as black and white as it was portrayed by the media, etc. Perhaps being a Russian living in the West and hence having an access to both Russian and Western and Ukrainian original sources, it helped me to get more thorough perspective on the conflict (instead of a one-sided one) and to spot contradictions of the official narratives (both NATO and Kremlin ones) by comparing information from different sources which many other Western and Russian people couldn’t do due to the language barrier. However, since I exposed Putin as a WEF agent and potential traitor to Russia in other articles, here I’d focus on countless contradictions of Western narrative which had killed my initial sympathy to Ukraine and its ‘just’ cause in its cradle.
First of all, it became pretty clear already since March of 2022 that NATO are playing a dirty game (not just ‘supporting Ukraine’) and that Ukraine isn’t as innocent as it was portrayed in our media either. For example, infamous American biolabs in Ukraine were exposed already in March of 2022. Yet, our media didn’t give a slightest shit about it, and official Ukrainian narrative didn’t change even a tiny a bit after this groundbreaking revelation, didn’t become more nuanced as it should have become after such a discovery. But nope. Then it was crystal clear for me that our media are deliberately lying on Ukraine, and that it’s yet one more psy op just like COVID scamdemic was.
Even the timing of this new psy op was chosen perfectly for them – when their COVID narrative was quickly breaking apart due to both Omicron new variant and Freedom Convoys spreading from Canada all over the West, our criminal globalist regime urgently needed a new boogieman to distract the public from their COVID crimes, and Ukrainian war came in handy there. Since it’s NATO and more broadly WEF billionaire elite behind COVID scamdemic who needed this war as I had just proved but it’s Putin who actually invaded, I immediately began to suspect Putin of treason by giving globalists what they wanted against best Russian national interest, but this I again told in my other articles too. Now to focus on NATO propaganda falsehoods and contradictions.
Those became even more numerous after discovery of American biolabs in Ukraine. Peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul were sabotaged by Boris Johnson. Ukrainian Nazi military including notorious Azov Battalion (but not limited to it!) began to display swastikas and other Nazi symbols and badges openly, and the Western media pretended it wasn’t happening. Ukraine began to launch terror attacks on Russian civilian infrastructure (like Crimea bridge) which should constitute a war crime but the West ignored even that because apparently as a ‘victim of foreign invasion’ Ukraine is above the law. Later on Ukraine or US or both had blown up both of Russian Nord Streams – yet another unprecedented terror attack – yet no one cared, no accountability ever came for any of the culprits.
Some might object that Ukraine was ‘justified in doing so’ because of the ‘Russian atrocities’ in Ukraine. First of all, even if those ‘Russian atrocities’ were real, they do not justify Ukrainian ones. For example, if your enemy would rape your daughter, would you now be justified to rape his? You see how ridiculous and evil this logic is? Second of all, most of so-called ‘Russian atrocities’ were no more than Ukrainian defamatory propaganda. For example, even Pentagon was unable to prove ‘Russian atrocities’ in Bucha which Kiyv claimed – and that pretty much means there were no any atrocities there because if there was at least something, Biden White house would have confirmed it, have no doubt. Later on, Amnesty International published a report on Ukrainian dirty military tactics – placing military units (which are legitimate Russian targets in war) in hospitals and schools and then blaming Russia for ‘slaughtering Ukrainian civilians’. I recall how much rage does this Amnesty International report caused in ZelenSSKy neo Nazi regime in Ukraine (who said that ‘Amnesty International gave amnesty to Russia’), and how I applauded Amnesty International for this surprising bout of honesty.
So, most of all so-called Russian atrocities in Ukraine were no more than fruits of Ukrainian propaganda. That is not to say that Ukrainian civilians didn’t die there – ofc they did, it’s war after all, and it’s sadly impossible to avoid civilian victims completely. But my point is that Russia being already blamed by the whole world for its military invasion and heavily sanctioned by the West had all the incentives to minimize civilian casualties in this war, but Ukraine, in the contrary, had all the incentives to maximize its civilian casualties to put more blame on Russia and, hence, to get more money and weapons from the West to ‘defend itself’. Amnesty International report proved just that. And it was pretty logical too.
But here’s an important point – if Ukrainian neo Nazi regime was willing to sacrifice even their own people just to put more blame on Russia and get more money from the West, how could we still support this regime? It was absolutely diabolic. Yet Western Mainstream Misledia kept presenting Ukraine as an ‘innocent victim’ and Russia as an ‘absolute evil’. You know, if their approach was more nuanced, if they were able to acknowledge at least Ukrainian Nazi problem and NATO provocations of Russia but claimed that it still didn’t justify Russian invasion, they might have gathered more genuine sympathy to Ukrainian cause among smart and decent people in the West. But since they kept lying and gaslighting and refused to acknowledge any Ukrainian fault however obvious and proven and any Russian valid point, however obvious and proven too, they had eventually turned more and more people from Ukraine, leaving only gullible dummies behind Ukrainian banners, and that was actually great. Leftist pathological, narcissistic inability to acknowledge any fault of their own side eventually turns against them, making them lose.
Another big turning point in Ukrainian narrative for me was how quickly it had changed from ‘Stop the war!’ to ‘Defeat Russia!’, and majority of gullible dummies failed to spot any inconsistency here. Again, it’s not that as a Russian I’m not chilled at the prospect of ‘defeating’ my country – moreover, I know that it’s impossible to defeat the greatest nuclear power in the world on the battlefield, so if anything, it proved to me one more time that the proclaimed goal of this war was thoroughly fake (because who put on purpose set an unattainable goal?) and that the real goals were different from proclaimed one, so, we were lied to one more time, and on a major scale.
But the more obvious and chilling thing with it was how they rapidly they shifted they proclaimed anti-war stance to a warmongering one – because you know, ‘Defeat Russia’ is the exact opposite of ‘Stop this war!’. In the contrary, it means – ‘continue this war until the enemy is defeated’ (which in turn means potentially forever because, again, as a greatest nuclear power in the world, Russia cannot be defeated). However, gullible dummies failed to spot the glaring inconsistency of this narrative change, and kept mindlessly cheering for Ukraine, not realizing that they’re cheering for more war now already and not for the end of the war as they did initially.
Again, all of it had taken any legitimacy away from NATO and Ukraine. Their cause wasn’t as just after all as they tried to convince people. If their cause was so just, why did they constantly lie about it? If Russian atrocities were so monstrous, why did they have to fake them? If they really wanted to end the war, why do they constantly fund more war? No Ukrainian warmonger is able to answer any of those questions.
Good post. War is wrong. This could have been avoided. Now millions are displaced or died needlessly. The fault is both sides but primarily Biden and Johnson in my view. What part of a neutral NATO zone did they not understand? As a Russian you clearly understand the social understanding by Russian citizens of national security. History has not been kind to that entire area. It brings to mind the exodus of starving Lithuanians last century heading to Western Europe Uk and North America.
War is wrong. Trump will end this conflict.
Like you Alex, I am a pacifist and conclude that where there is war it is not goodies v. baddies, but baddies v baddies. In this day and age lobbing missiles and mortar shells at other human beings to settle a dispute is beyond ridiculous. Only the arms industry could think otherwise. If the United Nations weren't the corrupt globalist mafia that it is, they would actually be peacekeepers, arbitrating disputes. It should be international law that any disputed territory instantly becomes an independent country rather than a bone to be torn apart by two dogs.